Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Mon, 08 May 2017 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2FD129467 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 06:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=aBq3V+2v; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bD++M2Pz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vjNUOwhNx4EY for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3DC12946C for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379B0209C0 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:15:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2017 09:15:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=YGKCdpG8x0+isl57PSB21UlLrTmF7 d2FckaVAjMkCAQ=; b=aBq3V+2vx4+nLJ79gSLbFp7asSgA+gEHB6I4+xF2+5M2X SrwyssYLFBYcwWvLWCAshd2zlfcqolLQglK7PiH8jWytmhM1mmJsjlYjn+Q1sqew A+ZQtO76lbWFac48L+PDdEk178bnccLzzEQXsjTOGVvwEDsBgckrn6pJhStKXolB W8oQfImX5cZuBV3feDBG1xoXMq4aBbq2sqP9GAMV0VskJ2KnlB+Ho5jLIiLZghge /PDTOK4TYwv0DY9oJxA53+ZSbDeusyD4C7zrKGBql6fnn/NhpDOqW5uK+muoKR2H 3ODYxbN/nxkaNP0FgFDTEPKnPj4As5X/ngpTBWKqA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=YGKCdp G8x0+isl57PSB21UlLrTmF7d2FckaVAjMkCAQ=; b=bD++M2Pz+qTq1vH48uggHw nTU0FG/hdJfSrJ/kmqUB/42HsY1Wvv2fPsNFQ+rj9mqjJkLMNDVEBBai6VSFcl9Y OKj3Ewlep3lFKNLByJ5wazXU16nv88HxpcQmhdAxynNALhwS7+1g8fZgVBSl3dIn UQDNdNYov7wHEEc00Rr+BrRNaZdf93B/5vHh0UtPvYwjH3ubmasWlRAWmLQzbxY7 aGx1ZSYrISBhiHcEKuJwsTbiJqptqQw6P0Asuh/yAcmUh2okG0Xvark3ARdAg5em Vqvz4I37t3ZYri2VhkM8YriUn4nwQP3EMZU3ti1JH2/ZvkjV8pBtn1ZAzn1JrxYQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:dm8QWSvzsIw3SbmRm5j1VfOHBBhV0_PH_i6GZbAo6QfoFtB_i0DjfA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0849ABAB70; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:15:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1494249333.88554.969416232.37D727E4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: jmap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc55fe1
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 23:15:33 +1000
References: <20170507123912.GA22520@snake.grepular.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170507123912.GA22520@snake.grepular.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/P9WIAmrryS6tFNNG5KxWBJ3HOpA>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 13:15:36 -0000

On Sun, 7 May 2017, at 22:39, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14284526
> > 
> > It's a rather silly discussion that went off onto a tangent, that's HN for
> > you.
> 
> I am the person who is responsible for that silly discussion and also ironically
> the person who said he wasn't invested in the success of JMAP enough to bring it
> to this very list. Well, here I am.

Hello and welcome.  Thanks for making the time to contribute :)  It is a topic worth discussing.

Cheers,

Bron.

-- 
  Bron Gondwana
  brong@fastmail.fm