IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: (with COMMENT)

rcordier@linagora.com Tue, 31 January 2023 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rcordier@linagora.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82FCC14E514; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=linagora.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMolHnOYgKNB; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.linagora.com (smtp.linagora.com [54.36.8.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D66FC14CF13; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?Open?PaaS?SMTP?server?for?Linagora? (unknown [51.83.109.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 194C43EE62; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 08:23:32 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=qLUt8z08IADEwuV+0MiCW5no6pB5cFhTryb/7bZMwdDZI9Kv5TGUP5Flg86IdEcNMydMaCmRkxQ43RwrOgrosJWy4iLpAaVYddML/DeFXzBaJ5FS65UT7t8g04EwwWWaZB84lpo+ziRG0yGdMeTA4wsn1HODNMoIpOqgmn4HyinW9IHvs84h39wpT9uGdXhQYW8R/7L9OjMohzhoxLYSyZfIKwr1+GfsJjW28tITN9k1P+AXwr/2mqUMbIszstSf0pt3MitwrtcHYD3jKITHKURz1QM7tS4FsRKdR792qOvrP8Dk6yvPBJEalr69JmXIJXLWyFbuzJ7UxLXcSnIpqg==; s=smtpoutjames; d=linagora.com; v=1; bh=0JNQMdYRqaN6LBrLDWNk6cURM5xLCPHNDswPe5MAdS8=; h=from : reply-to : subject : date : to : cc : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive;
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:23:32 +0000
Message-ID: <1913604576.61.1675149812635@212e230e4d2f>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-LINAGORA-Copy-Delivery-Done: 1
From: rcordier@linagora.com
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-quotas@ietf.org, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, jmap@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com
Reply-To: rcordier@linagora.com
User-Agent: Team-Mail/0.5.2 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-=Part.1ef.cb96fc4199c11d64.18606b58a1e.f7375eeb06914d3d=-"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Pd--sEHbVyRfuvnSd9pO0QEkyTw>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:23:41 -0000

Hello Erik,

Sorry to answer you this late. Thanks for the review and your comments, I think it makes to apply them, and it is fixed in the new version 11 of the draft. 

Here are the changes: https://github.com/jmapio/jmap/pull/376/commits/09b6be87e17d84f6ea4584bcab3b6908dddedffc

Best regards,

Rene.

On Dec 12, 2022 10:44 AM, from Erik Kline Via Datatracker Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-quotas/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10
CC @ekline

## Comments

### S6

* "to receive notifications" -> "to allow clients to receive notifications"

  Who/what is receiving the notifications seemed unclear to me. It read to
  me as though the server should support push so that the server could
  receive updates.  My assumption from a scan of 8620 S7 is that clients
  receive pushes.

## Nits

### S4.2

* "they judge changing frequently"

  Perhaps either "they judge to be changing frequently" or
  "they judge change frequently".



_______________________________________________
Jmap mailing list
Jmap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email