Re: [Jmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-02.txt

Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2020 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112453A0A26 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.b=GTUNRzpM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iApwq2yU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xw4_p6CxqRdc for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4D153A09F1 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1C3803; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:06:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:06:46 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=S 1OetyZNOHc8DnTUKU4i8r6cJ23U32tNXuaPDva1mGY=; b=GTUNRzpMGoR5sD5oS Rz4fXGK3lkQrdWtiPWCDY/2kreWvCBK7WC7zgNz1ehEzcNz95qxmoPJvnwC0ZpdJ mbM9BdEsNrxEGmADVV6eP+JTlKJK0aeyWXOCiY+finTT3Ie53kAX7mG1LrJxa3jy 7hZ0OUBAk4xK1QXek4U3nyFFxzs5Wiq/bmrvUJHVcMy3oMnhiyyw411pgT3xQj7p 7BiI01jqTqFOdOHFmBdfAxfYjAj4NfVvyzexgoXaErlSzZrEO8DUOWr4y6Iu4Ekl 43zSLeWDpZIIRrQDHuRutde7fsoYVyOeauOpMvpUnFb7oaw5u3z3ddz0rDcBioY7 nxGeQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=S1OetyZNOHc8DnTUKU4i8r6cJ23U32tNXuaPDva1m GY=; b=iApwq2yUfGYdaAGoO8POWH+1WB9sXJqGWj5mVFiVFDFLYV7xbsehfBhTE GLzaVy8MktXxZXuZAb2OyLeaxVTBZatU1e11ajJ6ISYVh+RH3gBZ0Upoq/S3aePQ CGWLzWglGsmhthBFgJIgrREC5TlZRzDGbf49VYolSkY+NkhZvK2qLq6CEOS5tggk GtdtcR4vvkJt4033EkBouGrU+/YtarGM3kObus/yLY/oEYkcc5hw7OOirdm4/LwW lcJIQVjPjT2YdVAcWZYHukoJuSdBoAeLyoPlWVZLNCNxrAFQe4qoh7B5p9iejMWl I8r3RWu88bH/3OkuCS2WaQucc2oFQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:BYq2X6F71M6-uOPNMRLiC-Dz6iGelD_NBVAbZGf-PSclyQICpAmuQQ> <xme:BYq2X7Vl7dXQTrvOVIotSI_K6H2TWwSm0xh6zmCR_ZEtyPVUvbo_bUzrGr21TeLUd znfV0GpSYJl2Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudefjedgjedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvnhcu ofhurhgthhhishhonhcuoehmuhhrtghhsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhephefhgfetleeuveeutdfhfeeuvdeukefgkeejueeuhfdtleehteffgfdv teeuueejnecukfhppeejgedrjeejrdekhedrvdehtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmuhhrtghhsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtgho mh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:BYq2X0JEsQ8MiesJ-aBRFYqpjp83fWyxLeVedBYWth6Af9VWggYINg> <xmx:BYq2X0HIiF-Y-m7F5c80Pqb0yL_GWl7uQb75_ZobHdCxHmevEChqXw> <xmx:BYq2XwVuV8dU-a9TV8ye0DlxHCWVaBRpdmVe6qsZvHOm9rwG3H3ZjA> <xmx:BYq2XzC6spNtimqrFGu53KLfK4Ji0-agqLa9vhRW18L9zho7j-hTAw>
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0F93E3280060; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:06:45 -0500 (EST)
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Cc: jmap@ietf.org
References: <160431690732.22434.10293492942158194310@ietfa.amsl.com> <36838c43-aefb-c7f9-d973-2e6f8df5e78f@open-xchange.com> <01RS6NIC0KZC005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <a044b1cb-97e0-a9da-4d6b-084f817d0c20@fastmail.com> <01RS6QFKSX1U0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <26b87332-75b7-9c98-7eab-482e4c4c427d@fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:06:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01RS6QFKSX1U0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/RF29iSHhfh15tR5cOadMsj4ItgA>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-02.txt
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:06:48 -0000

On 11/19/20 9:54 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
>> Don't we have the same single-script/multi-script client issue with
>> managesieve?
>
> Yes. That's kind of the point.
>
>> Or perhaps I'm not fully understanding your concern.
>
>> A separate question that comes to mind, is do we want JMAP Sieve servers
>> to be able to only support a single script?  I guess in this case, the
>> server could simply have a single script with id "singleton" which can
>> only be updated and (de)activated.  Any attempt to create another script
>> or destroy the existing one would fail with a "singleton" error.
>
> Indeed. It seems like we're asking a lot of clients here. And if the 
> past is
> any indication, we're likely to be disappointed by what we get.


So, its sounds like you're making an argument that JMAP Sieve should 
always operate on a singleton.  Am I correct?

Obviously, this takes the Sieve "include" extension of the table.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC