IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Call for adoption: JMAP QUOTA

"Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com> Mon, 30 September 2019 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFB81201E5 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=rEMS9K1T; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=U3LHG4sc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWuoCfN68Xg8 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A2812006B for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62C7676 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap99 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:38:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=afaOFlS Hvcu44R1wtxGuTYpvOXgpWogN5mE9TxmpSKA=; b=rEMS9K1TbKiyHlyCLIuWJ68 MIjq8Gz8BWwXX9+CCm/q8oHqhsyjd4kwfHHPJtRKAmvjblIws2kuoPhTwyHUl6tU J8OVDae4+6OyKAj1q5NJZokOdlthLmhGoFLS1Etjnd1LBQji4t4irL2zPJgF4etb Tjcs7ckDzOuZJuGPpsKVXonzzHcd1NoW63rHmwhNYL+/d+5cYj7J3MTDE7vcdvDw edfX0/PiEOj4BaIX2C3a4Y15ha8a5PIVAZ8dHmvvmyAjG6FlREWq1enh8HDMfYZS 212A8mZw+1mr0CLguhIFGua/15m7eVxdGh9E6I07Hh5mhUN+NmhVFI0NHxcf2ng= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=afaOFl SHvcu44R1wtxGuTYpvOXgpWogN5mE9TxmpSKA=; b=U3LHG4sc+DsnJV6oGLL4Pb fTAr8vap93Z/vn9IzVJMYUMTS+A9D87VMZCAl6qXR8/2uUrbEju4pYKHVoILCT5V xI2no3ajjb4rKQ0P4ie3BO+4n3AjhUI0VWFY2tOj7RfLO+R2JK86XjDAUwlKeFJf ZwUqcv8yPSHb3V4ayNDcxGh58bavYd/kpew27MvzFZ1rpgAcfslcxsQsfYDQ7HWB jFuX76yh6IwdtwdaV0nU/a1Qi8+hwdDvlRyvDK+lQXLgTRuyOFN5i5hwBPUgdiFb 5u+JHAHVxPkpnCos5ci52IfZLWvrQyRbXyQ1VtncVSoaAjAzKNxO0qfFOTDvgyVw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:PduRXfaZ3jshXQvR9i84-RTY7RV9wf0K3Fz5BOmsvVNhH3blIYP3vw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrgedvgddvjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomh dpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghs thhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:PduRXSqHB2CWRBPOB5suSMT1OuvJP04r3obOJcA6hkJDY4rX_r_Uog> <xmx:PduRXc81B28BLvpIlcjK6pPKABfOGblKIwCI2fm7iKDgrwfszLP7bA> <xmx:PduRXZ_sPOzwiWpXCKW3ElJcSYVok2_jVLGLW4pHyfp4zYX2BMSzdg> <xmx:PduRXQwodeXvpnouA1ZrA_Ol_wqDnInYmhxovcDE49XwccI7siUAyw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3803F308DEB; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-319-g87cda76-fmnext-20190926v2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <9d37d5c2-2929-494a-90e5-053b675a55cf@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Mime4j.4f.af7c7bf6b92224d0.16d81551f61@linagora.com>
References: <Mime4j.4f.af7c7bf6b92224d0.16d81551f61@linagora.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:38:42 +1000
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="43a89163539f4e4680f50e97b8d1ccb8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/XlnWdfArMOpoSIJmKVJIYNfq8fk>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Call for adoption: JMAP QUOTA
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:38:59 -0000

For sure! Sorry I forgot to move forward on it. If you could upload it with the name draft-ietf-jmap-quota then we can start work on the next revision :)

It will obviously be on the agenda for Singapore as well.

Cheers,

Bron.

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, at 18:41, René CORDIER wrote:
> Hi everybody,

> I believe I saw some concerns during the call for adoption that will definitely deserve some attention, like multiple levels of quotas, or trying to understand why quotas with IMAP were not widely supported and what can we do to change it with JMAP.

> But I don't remember seeing any strong objection to it ! The vote was supposed to finish Friday 20th of September. Is it reasonable to ask to move forward then?

> Regards,

> Rene.

> Le 6 septembre 2019 07:36, de brong@fastmailteam.com
>> Just to make it official!
>> 
>> This is a call for adoption for a specification for exposing (and potentially also managing) quotas over JMAP. As there are already multiple people in favour per the thread at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/G4C83gJEgjrjxi52J7UKaMc9TpY I am asking now if there are any objections.
>> 
>> If you do have objections, please make them by Friday, 20 September (2 weeks from today). If there are no objections we will adopt a draft at that point.
>> 
>> As a starting point we will work from https://github.com/linagora/jmap/pull/19.
>> 
>> I believe this work is within our charter, specifically:
>> 
>>> Extensions to the existing core and* mail* JMAP specifications are also
>>> within scope for this working group, for example any additional parts
>>> of SIEVE, *IMAP*, SMTP submission, as well as transport of JMAP over
>>> WSS (WebSocket over TLS, RFC 6455).
>> 
>> Quota exists as part of IMAP (RFC2087), so is in scope.
>> 
>> This proposed work will also take into account the work on IMAP quota being done in the EXTRA working group on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-quota/
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Bron.
>> 
>> --
>>  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>>  brong@fastmailteam.com
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jmap mailing list
> Jmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap
> 

--
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
 brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email