[Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 08 January 2020 12:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-websocket@ietf.org, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, jmap@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <157848809108.22615.18269038960236690776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 04:54:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/aDdVekxgQsBiebVaRD5DdgrF1IE>
Subject: [Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-websocket/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

I only have one nit, as a comment:

The references to Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.5.1 of RFC8620, in Section 4 of this
document, seem wrong. I believe they should, be 3.3, 3.4, 3.6.1, respectively.

[Jmap] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-i… Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker