Re: [Jmap] Benjamin Kaduk's Block on charter-ietf-jmap-01-00: (with BLOCK)

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Thu, 02 May 2019 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E884120333; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=nU7R7POS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=UnReBI5g
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGHrsdgLMxmx; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132EA12031D; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A3C25645; Thu, 2 May 2019 06:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 May 2019 06:27:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=jiJeDoI7x7qn/aFzY8mEK/na9Omiuty +YknunfJNPxk=; b=nU7R7POSVJXHNt4Inyp7UDEsa6ybsyDJutgbP2D5aojT4Dc SxQy3aaQLozJ5s+KcFgvhx9gsmfvKoQKxvzg0yW1dEO01M0fvdvqvDF5EON9DbpS khEGMEX1dkbmbm1giDUB/Dd62LBoSW/Rw/cUbbjsWyKxQdypRSEKLwnUZaAU4rHz IXT4zZwIdPwv1/Hjy6cTzDNOFwm352Y7QsusoJgdjUyepPs9hx5eMrOYzujYCMc+ GhRQIPSr+xoxEXRC13dzyAeoXTdYCOYBphzwrtl71keDjPLOSf+M4Thc5BjJvqXm 6ZlKeuq4btWIKLQWaDFPWwgPbLwwY3DJFcHz5vA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=jiJeDo I7x7qn/aFzY8mEK/na9Omiuty+YknunfJNPxk=; b=UnReBI5g+cxOTdq4EgUsDT zqlvYlmqsJvSHoP/yUwImTk3G5bjr2a1lnk3MP+KvCObnXWqg7DjR8J0gsFYmAxe mziOuehoCHOeXSejtvAwvhAs74O8DkhmGr50ng4Ql+ToOIKqEHAHP/Lfb24iKPKl xkRJUpYmv6FlXq7B19xxaZDy3w7BosjVLBjwvyYK7VEPKAJCl5eOHwXkVqAUpnvw MstDImBREwXdlRVHBhNzxtMn1wGwZhL4KrkuqWfXgBBLbQiLg0VNdh2zjZg9jfDj YJoFJQ12pXgdUUFItDz0K7B+kAlpKQ6vhJKbaHaQgNID9l074SJBjm+GCiCWCsHg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:CcbKXG_6Ls6Ux5czBije-tUAhcYELAUzFEArMzudcl4w302PlGRKeg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrieelgdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehlvgig vgihucfovghlnhhikhhovhdfuceorggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfh hmqeenucffohhmrghinhephhhtthhpshdrihhnnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pegrrghmvghlnhhikhhovhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:CcbKXPiXFCpxA01TiZ459QJrG_Z8z_zZA2YJyLTDIn3q8fWHvOS3jw> <xmx:CcbKXCXNVifmhKioPuTV8_t5pgxQuYRMZ5izOivoQ9ewuLPoMjnohg> <xmx:CcbKXFEM7eHtnqSy77wZoaB7fzoExPtVSv3UK1eoTdYeKhNbGjZWKg> <xmx:CsbKXNHAxE8-_ffyL84al7AhbyYIwlVWmwisE20cLoZ1uhramhCp0w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 746BFD4931; Thu, 2 May 2019 06:27:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-449-gfb3fc5a-fmstable-20190430v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20ebf56f-4d8b-4840-b854-58d7eedc1390@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <155675571560.2931.9840518132194126377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <155675571560.2931.9840518132194126377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 06:26:57 -0400
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: jmap@ietf.org, jmap-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/gPhL33GPSp0GEA2d5KJjupQ5gAg>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Benjamin Kaduk's Block on charter-ietf-jmap-01-00: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 10:27:24 -0000

Hi Benjamin,

On Thu, May 2, 2019, at 1:08 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> BLOCK:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If we're going to be talking about new transports (e.g., websockets, or 
> the more
> generic "different protocols than HTTPS"), we should say something 
> about ensuring
> that the appropriate security properties are retained in the new 
> setup(s).

I've added the following to the Charter:

4) New transports for transporting JMAP will have security properties
   comparable to HTTPS. In particular they have to require TLS.

The only proposal on the table is based on WSS, so this is no brainer.

Best Regards,
Alexey