Return-Path: <mauro@stalw.art>
X-Original-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E302C7146C2
	for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Mar 2026 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=stalw.art header.b="cHmtCdsx"; dkim=neutral
	reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)"
	header.d=stalw.art header.b="IYm8Dmnf"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31])
	by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id w_pGx5X31-0B for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>;
	Mon,  9 Mar 2026 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.stalw.art (mail.stalw.art [135.181.195.209])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A87DC7146B2
	for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Mar 2026 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202404r; d=stalw.art; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1773081810; bh=oZTd0w6rXFUlLt26r2Gaht7
	yJvysOywZHVrJk4cYW9g=; b=cHmtCdsx8gUTvJu/iQOeiEixgHcJfOXzXQPzjU2lsT/+Ol7xk8
	METOVN8u6VT+JoIGl5zx9B9HvbCNhVdgk/a3Wjnb2zGlrnRvRxKZrwdSKynags8qAqRlsfwlAlz
	G7W5cqR4RFPWr9OvGA8bXGa6n9w5aPeUwo3sx5QV4ScxiwgrdeRxjYuLuY2LbQ0lpjAMoBebqOD
	hfLsxPUP+utwB+TGQITQJv0o3fsEbCKo3oMPRxo3to1ZLhgG+YRXHvJ/0RWsiMqB1oIAw8/bbtj
	WpkADevqZrNpg78ATfyoVAQcWPMlEAhnV9DGYvxnaefVt941n4MYhZXGI5gFLq4Eaag==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202404e; d=stalw.art;
 c=relaxed/relaxed;
	h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1773081810; bh=oZTd0w6rXFUlLt26r2Gaht7
	yJvysOywZHVrJk4cYW9g=; b=IYm8DmnfxKfCR5RPRYC+/TmHIsqIdy7oT/m+itygR/S+YH9Zf0
	6vA0zrDT4eUZsqgAK/0VhhdQeXFa47p8uvAA==;
From: Mauro De Gennaro <mauro@stalw.art>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.21\))
Message-Id: <8397988B-24C5-42D7-BD1E-45CEDD009AC5@stalw.art>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 19:43:19 +0100
To: JMAP IETF <jmap@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.21)
Message-ID-Hash: GAEKAZCFQJCEDIZ457HXYNUIACU3WNN3
X-Message-ID-Hash: GAEKAZCFQJCEDIZ457HXYNUIACU3WNN3
X-MailFrom: mauro@stalw.art
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-jmap.ietf.org-0;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BJMAP=5D_Status_of_JMAP_Metadata=2C_RefPlus_and_Mail_Sharing_dra?=
 =?utf-8?q?fts_ahead_of_IETF_125?=
List-Id: JSON Meta Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/rn88O3vPtJyfVw81-x7IZ9aYrpo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jmap-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jmap-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jmap-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

I wanted to give a quick update on three WG drafts I have been working =
on: JMAP Object Metadata, JMAP Enhanced Result References, and JMAP Mail =
Sharing.

The latest versions of these drafts include the suggestions and changes =
that Neil and Bron proposed. =46rom my point of view the documents are =
now complete. However, if anyone has questions about the drafts or would =
like to propose any further changes, please send them to the list.

I would also like to know if people want to discuss any of these drafts =
during the JMAP session at IETF 125. If there is interest in discussion, =
I can ask Bron to allocate time on the agenda. Otherwise I do not have =
anything new to present about these drafts at the meeting.

For reference, here are the current versions:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-metadata/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-refplus/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-mail-sharing/


Thanks,
Mauro

