Re: [jose] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

On 16 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Jim Schaad wrote:

> I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in 
> the document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into 
> the registry as well when it is published.

I agree . I didn't call that out because that one _was_ mentioned in the 
last call announcement.

Thanks,

Ben.

>
> Jim
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM
>> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: [e-mail]; Jim Schaad 
>> <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on 
>> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with
>> COMMENT)
>>
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
>> email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this 
>> introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does 
>> not
>> appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in 
>> the downref
>> registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I 
>> don't suggest
>> any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people 
>> hadn't already
>> noticed.
>>