IETF Logo Mail Archive

[jose] Question on enc location

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E07711E818F for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHMcFowJXJgu for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643E811E8198 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (50-39-216-54.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.216.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7A852C9EF for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: jose@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:33:17 -0700
Message-ID: <05a101ce8733$d96415e0$8c2c41a0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05A2_01CE86F9.2D060130"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6HM7oJ9KwXoeAcSzSJtgQcSJVj8g==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [jose] Question on enc location
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:34:28 -0000

Is there supposed to be a requirement in the JWE specification that the enc
field be in the common protected (or unprotected) header and no in the
individual recipient header information?

 

Jim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email