[jose] Keys in the documents
"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BF311E8142 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruRqEa8EYbmd for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5C911E8143 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (mail.augustcellars.com [50.34.17.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CD222CA40; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:28:35 -0700
Message-ID: <05ca01ce6e1e$a663ddc0$f32b9940$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05CB_01CE6DE3.FA0553E0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: Ac5uHoEIhUHF1bDIRb+g9Dwvv0NexQ==
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: [jose] Keys in the documents
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:29:37 -0000
Is there any reason not to provide the public and private keys in the appendixes as JWK objects? This would make them easier to understand and put them into a format that one expects to be understood by JOSE systems. Jim
- [jose] Keys in the documents Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Matt Miller (mamille2)
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Brian Campbell
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Keys in the documents Brian Campbell