IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

"Salvatore D'Agostino" <sal@idmachines.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sal@idmachines.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F66921F92F2 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3CCzyNUNYo5 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3419A21F9265 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod1.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.120]) by atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3K2glU1024840 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:42:47 -0400
Received: (qmail 15724 invoked by uid 0); 20 Apr 2013 02:42:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO salPC) (sal@idmachines.com@74.104.35.96) by 0 with ESMTPA; 20 Apr 2013 02:42:46 -0000
From: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com>
To: odonoghue@isoc.org
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org> <8ACF653B-8300-45F9-9030-2C5B3BE271E9@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ACF653B-8300-45F9-9030-2C5B3BE271E9@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:42:45 -0400
Message-ID: <06c601ce3d70$bd2eb770$378c2650$@com>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac47rfvJtH0yY0FKQG6H4VkhQfg56gBwptfg
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_06BE_01CE3D4F.317169B0"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:42:49 -0000

1, sorry for late replies hectic week here in Boston.

 

Sal D'Agostino

 

On 2013-04-11, at 8:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

 





Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests
requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in all
JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by
means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?

Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?

1.  Yes.

2.   No. 

0.  I need more information to decide.

 

Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). 

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email