Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

[hideki nara <[e-mail]>]

+1
---
hideki

2015-07-13 2:32 GMT+09:00 Nat Sakimura <[e-mail]>:

> Sorry to chime in so late. I have been completely under water for sometime
> now.
>
> Like Phil, I do see that draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options sort
> of thing can be very useful, though I may want to have slightly different
> way of encoding the things. Being able to do detached signature is quite
> attractive.
>
> Best,
>
> Nat
>
> 2015-07-10 2:37 GMT+09:00 Kathleen Moriarty <
> [e-mail]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  About
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00,
>> I’ll add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard
>> Barnes in JOSE Issues #26 “Allow for signature payload to not be base64
>> encoded” and #23 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 “Make
>> crypto independent of binary encoding (base64)”.
>>
>>
>>
>> About
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01,
>> I’ll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue
>> #2 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 “No key management
>> for MAC”.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, there’s a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs
>> going on in the COSE working group.  See the thread “[Cose] Key
>> management for MACs (was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)” –
>> especially
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4
>> and
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10.
>>
>>
>>
>> One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management
>> draft should be informed by the related decision in COSE.  Specifically,
>> that if COSE decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning
>> likely should apply to our decision on whether to define a standard
>> mechanism for supporting key management for MACs in JOSE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Key management is explicitly out-of-scope for COSE as stated in the
>> charter.  The discussion referenced had this point at the close of that
>> discussion.
>>
>> I'm not seeing much support for these drafts moving forward in JOSE.  I'm
>> also not seeing enough to justify standards track and AD sponsored.  If you
>> think these are important to have move forward in the WG or as standards
>> track, please say so soon.  They can still go forward through the
>> Independent submission process through the ISE.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kathleen
>>
>>                                                             -- Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* jose [mailto:[e-mail] <[e-mail]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Karen O'Donoghue
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM
>> *To:* [e-mail]
>> *Subject:* [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
>>
>>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two
>> remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include:
>> 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual
>> drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your
>> thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would
>> like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15
>> July.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Karen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>