[jose] #79: Validation of JWK objects and JWK sets
"jose issue tracker" <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sun, 18 August 2013 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FFC21F9D23 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SshosaViRGlI for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E584521F9D0F for <jose@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40517 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1VB8yt-0001If-63; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:49:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com
X-Trac-Project: jose
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:49:43 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/jose/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/79
Message-ID: <061.ecd4dc1525e17170ba2bb355e283e0bf@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 79
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, jose@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: mbj@microsoft.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130818194946.E584521F9D0F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:46 -0700
Resent-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: [jose] #79: Validation of JWK objects and JWK sets
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:23:08 -0000
#79: Validation of JWK objects and JWK sets Some place in the document there needs to be a discussion of how to validate a JWK element. Need to have a statement that each JWK in the set is to be validated independently, the invalidation of one JWK in the set does not affect the validity of any other JWK in the set. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-jose-json-web- ietf@augustcellars.com | key@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: json-web- | Version: key | Keywords: Severity: - | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/79> jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
- [jose] #79: Validation of JWK objects and JWK sets jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #79: Validation of JWK objects and JWK… jose issue tracker