[jose] #78: Seciton 4. JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set) Format
"jose issue tracker" <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sun, 18 August 2013 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C116921F9D04 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cppjGash+caG for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F021F9CC6 for <jose@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40508 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1VB8y8-0002db-5i; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:48:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com
X-Trac-Project: jose
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:48:56 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/jose/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/78
Message-ID: <061.628c1d34d9df4f9348f3c33a82a4328b@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 78
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, jose@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: mbj@microsoft.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130818194859.E53F021F9CC6@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:48:59 -0700
Resent-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: [jose] #78: Seciton 4. JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set) Format
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:23:08 -0000
#78: Seciton 4. JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set) Format A. In the first sentence - there is no need to document the structure o a JWK - this is what section 4.1 is for s/as the value of its "keys" member// B. names within does not say it is at a single lexical scope or not. C. MAY in paragraph 3 is wrong - see 2119 analysis (Ticket #48) -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-jose-json-web- ietf@augustcellars.com | key@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Editorial | Milestone: Component: json-web- | Version: key | Keywords: Severity: - | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/78> jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
- [jose] #78: Seciton 4. JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set)… jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #78: Seciton 4. JSON Web Key Set (JWK … jose issue tracker