IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] #12: x5c incorrect in JWE

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760EE21F8793 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPOnuTKbf29O for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22b.google.com (mail-ia0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8730821F863B for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r13so2036023iar.30 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=7WEAPa1nQJ5JCnoSomqMDFiT5hJfegIavYDxfXn8+Gs=; b=Yk0S5FQQwM4pBwWmEsuOjA8D8SyLptOJQyzctzzYCAdemkNpoYl6VZHT+9QW7dy1U4 xBSVQAIf0BG/FxwujhSVgyF/603+KWU+PhufexyvSTeT+VQj7SGLvX9npDcdcnFbA9fd C4mDQ0aDXvm0ixSN+bXmgsl0TOX6vEH5NAiOp6oFfkvyqz5jVcmpP/LYNL17SVUpCU95 zPE0h2bt5WZSN6O7uDq95jhZebWxyNO3t0Ais19rlyx0ZT1esgJtlcUtlCO1iINVdulk PxyPeTnfchMthscrtulgPQn9sHFR5g1A0DPEJkRSLoL75MjXWu2eP/83VnSjeuJjh4x0 7zaw==
X-Received: by 10.50.97.65 with SMTP id dy1mr5116212igb.109.1366843809920; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.39] (190-20-16-122.baf.movistar.cl. [190.20.16.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm30162639igc.3.2013.04.24.15.50.04 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3F214E0-E170-4FC4-9A2F-15D9FF261633"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSUfDRC9kyOjsH_aNA+cUKDzkXjJjqTyFDs=BBSFW8VPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:49:48 -0300
Message-Id: <72786B82-6E82-42B0-ACA6-EEE65C11E6B2@ve7jtb.com>
References: <065.7762ca21750ef2a07382e66a81acadef@trac.tools.ietf.org> <080.d547c42b8fc19d53d58ed7298e2ddfcb@trac.tools.ietf.org> <CAL02cgSUfDRC9kyOjsH_aNA+cUKDzkXjJjqTyFDs=BBSFW8VPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkAtNd8nVV3/r1d0u18lRimPMvffeGg8mVuBsnDHwtwclhMEcHLAsDxRxdAJxdfaK4tcy7
Cc: "draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org>, Michael Jones <michael.jones@microsoft.com>, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>, jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] #12: x5c incorrect in JWE
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:50:11 -0000

Agreed

On 2013-04-24, at 7:17 PM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> I don't object to closing this.  I don't really think that "x5c" is that useful, but at least it's properly specified now.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:44 PM, jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> wrote:
> #12: x5c incorrect in JWE
> 
> 
> Comment (by michael.jones@microsoft.com):
> 
>  draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-09 now uniformly uses the language
>  "the key to which the JWE was encrypted" when describing the key - not
>  just for "x5c" but for all the key specification parameters.  This is now
>  both correct and clear.  Therefore, I believe that this issue should be
>  closed.
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
>  Reporter:                           |       Owner:  draft-ietf-jose-json-
>   bcampbell@pingidentity.com         |  web-encryption@tools.ietf.org
>      Type:  defect                   |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  minor                    |   Milestone:
> Component:  json-web-encryption      |     Version:
>  Severity:  Submitted WG Document    |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:                           |
> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
> 
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12#comment:4>
> jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email