Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 05 July 2013 23:05 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA4021F9F87 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBl4CKjWeKt6 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B203421F9F30 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n57so2356496wev.14 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UR+NBCDClUIdDF6QdBOZ5RJJBW1ieEVMpudIHnKtjxo=; b=vh3Nz6DwYpedQEKcUeO/EFOzalSZ7qpO3Vh0DCmzfj02ArCHKmmQKMhBc+AggS38xF 2bOrWA7wKUy0SLERJgyKf3PRd80R4pSRfdHABlpnBu0XqGe5bq4CCEUYLXjCO79VZ5j2 iKjeKeIMrhHuuKUqGxTTIkuWZwk3QLgqcdmEetFhq5Et+adgXND5K7gNOhroO2CbCof6 ohH8eJp1j4qT8PUZlDPJRJ5hw8qUmKAMj2PGb1ocUYCXPh6KiKlC4/WPXleFWfTn0V9I 7gJK9xzMwdF00Vhh6XX+mFCsdVhxS2DY2mhxF2T0s7k6/9EHxpzicne6+enCPXuklzYl Kr/g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.187.235 with SMTP id fv11mr6737889wic.65.1373065501853; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <009a01ce79d1$a7c40410$f74c0c30$@augustcellars.com>
References: <008b01ce79c6$f5b30a00$e1191e00$@augustcellars.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943678E34AF@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <009a01ce79d1$a7c40410$f74c0c30$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:05:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVj24od5c-bdN7yDbPp9KUg36yVhkp-3hru6QBx_VZeuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, jose <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 23:05:03 -0000
On 5 July 2013 15:47, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > I am glad to hear that, but it does not address the question that I asked Are you asking if the IETF JOSE working group should send a liaison statement?
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Richard Barnes
- [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Martin Thomson
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Russ Housley
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Ryan Sleevi