Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5810)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 15 August 2019 04:09 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D8E12001A for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A20tmCLOBjlI for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50AC120018 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x7F48vf1029518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 00:09:00 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 23:08:57 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: 'RFC Errata System' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mbj@microsoft.com, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, n-sakimura@nri.co.jp, rdd@cert.org, odonoghue@isoc.org, jose@ietf.org, avinash44491@gmail.com
Message-ID: <20190815040857.GL88236@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20190813221952.2D65BB813FF@rfc-editor.org> <02c501d55253$1c2249b0$5466dd10$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <02c501d55253$1c2249b0$5466dd10$@augustcellars.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/CYJPoGeAtMe4OeeDTLeFth_Lsyc>
Subject: Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5810)
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:09:20 -0000
My recollection is that the RFC Editor will usually delete these, yes. -Ben On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:48:14PM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote: > This goes as a won't fix or delete because it is not a real errata. > > The errata has been reported against the html-ized version of the RFC and not against the RFC proper. How links work for the HTML-ized version is to link first to the reference and then you can go from there to the other document. > > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 3:20 PM > To: mbj@microsoft.com; ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com; n-sakimura@nri.co.jp; rdd@cert.org; kaduk@mit.edu; odonoghue@isoc.org; ietf@augustcellars.com > Cc: avinash44491@gmail.com; jose@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5810) > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7515, "JSON Web Signature (JWS)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5810 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Avinash Kumar Singh <avinash44491@gmail.com> > > Section: 1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Cryptographic algorithms and identifiers for use with this > specification are described in the separate JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) > [JWA] specification and an IANA registry defined by that > specification. Related encryption capabilities are described in the > separate JSON Web Encryption (JWE) [JWE] specification. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > The Hyperlink used for JWA and JWE is not working and pointing to the same RFC 7515. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7515 (draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-41) > -------------------------------------- > Title : JSON Web Signature (JWS) > Publication Date : May 2015 > Author(s) : M. Jones, J. Bradley, N. Sakimura > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Javascript Object Signing and Encryption > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > jose@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5810) RFC Errata System
- Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5… Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (5… Megan Ferguson