Re: [jose] Keys in the documents

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 21 June 2013 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B8321E80F3 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.37
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRpWzacV82Y8 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22d.google.com (mail-oa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F16921E80DF for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j1so8671640oag.4 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=kIbl5eAQYlJKXnwzmrvt7Nwttpjp9Kn39GaVEvq+5eE=; b=hSNKdvh7WfsW/gB1mV02lztcg6tVgMLT+1Z+WXdS0Sc1KsLa0LysxG7fmaGhUWyO0O u4YbR+gEbZw/hDHGDHMCSYh6eSeCeipWmRzKqt1yMONQLSYBMWIx7k/UCfJhYRxGXqOY BG69pK+Mhy0ZlfHQZTs8InWszpd/mF4sBAM5DPbPq1AAnoTLthVWZnjB6uEVQqI9uJHg XC/pbCxFw6QsE+XBOFsX7stx92wGJQMAmtGoXIER1b+sWPlZ889/xvoYcDVF4YD1t/QX iACAG6CV8w1+7rcPUNvg2t6WcBASwUL8WZP63PW+nNuuKOlbWp55mZkmTts8H7XZjPkn z8Bw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.144.233 with SMTP id sp9mr5636991oeb.53.1371782938286; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.26.135 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [108.18.40.68]
In-Reply-To: <05ca01ce6e1e$a663ddc0$f32b9940$@augustcellars.com>
References: <05ca01ce6e1e$a663ddc0$f32b9940$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:48:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRS_v1rrj8Xs6bYFg5OHjKG1Gq0rc4xcoMED9j-3aTjHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a8b66bef02f04dfa11a67"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaH+Mu3tVJVCFHpbslNTcPpv4xGW35JfJeaYVyzHH7h13TOuz43+pUreXOPiQRgpj1N4hQ
Cc: "draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Keys in the documents
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:49:11 -0000

+1

On Thursday, June 20, 2013, Jim Schaad wrote:

> Is there any reason not to provide the public and private keys in the
> appendixes as JWK objects?  This would make them easier to understand and
> put them into a format that one expects to be understood by JOSE systems.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Jim****
>
> ** **
>