Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
"Salvatore D'Agostino" <sal@idmachines.com> Sat, 20 April 2013 02:38 UTC
Return-Path: <sal@idmachines.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826B821F9265 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYgHhdSInIaR for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob14.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob14.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932DE21F91CA for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod1.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.118]) by atl4mhob14.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3K2cX1q029341 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:38:33 -0400
Received: (qmail 19951 invoked by uid 0); 20 Apr 2013 02:38:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO salPC) (sal@idmachines.com@74.104.35.96) by 0 with ESMTPA; 20 Apr 2013 02:38:32 -0000
From: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com>
To: 'Karen ODonoghue' <odonoghue@isoc.org>
References: <51674E17.5020902@isoc.org> <CAL02cgTY8=hkGPUhJKUoexO2w6qunuufs=e6GNgYhA2Bw8EYOg@mail.gmail.com> <B32CF5D4-67CC-43AA-8BFC-FF0BF49D7BF5@cisco.com> <5170B20D.8040305@gluu.org> <CABzCy2D-vikNpK3vZCaybUZSPKu7io48aMJUrtAa1JeZNOZy=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2D-vikNpK3vZCaybUZSPKu7io48aMJUrtAa1JeZNOZy=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:38:31 -0400
Message-ID: <06a201ce3d70$25f7c770$71e75650$@com>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac483nHNftXn/DWRSEGbdq3RutLsdwAkUyEQ
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_069E_01CE3D4E.8FC8D490"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:38:36 -0000
1 Salvatore D'Agostino, CSCIP IDmachines LLC |1264 Beacon Street, #5 | Brookline, MA 02446 | USA http:\\www.idmachines.com | http:\\idmachines.blogspot.com | @idmachines +1 617.201.4809 ph | +1 617.812.6495 fax > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>wrote: > > Issue #7 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/7 points out > that the JWA algorithm identifiers are different than those used by > the W3C WebCrypto draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/. The > JWA algorithm identifiers are strings, whereas the W3C WebCrypto > algorithm identifiers are structures including string identifiers. > The working group had previously decided to continue representing JOSE > algorithms as strings, as recorded at > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg01219.html. > **** > > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?**** > > 1. Continue have the JWA algorithm identifiers be strings, and not > objects. Note that WebCrypto may choose to use some of these same > strings, where applicable.**** > > 2. Switch to using the algorithm identifier structures defined in the > WebCrypto draft.**** > > 3. Another resolution (please specify in detail).**** > > 0. I need more information to decide.**** > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > jose@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Dick Hardt
- [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7:… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Axel.Nennker
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Roland Hedberg
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… hideki nara
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… nov matake
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Matias Woloski
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Edmund Jay
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Sascha Preibisch
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Matt Miller
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… charles.marais@orange.com
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… John Bradley
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Javier Rojas Blum
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
- Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue… Salvatore D'Agostino