IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Consensus calls

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527D21F844C for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNRkJ0DCwKYz for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0238.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC321F843F for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2FFO11FD012.protection.gbl (10.173.161.201) by BL2FFO11HUB040.protection.gbl (10.173.160.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.3; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:10 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD012.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.651.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:08 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.224]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:01 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Thread-Topic: [jose] Consensus calls
Thread-Index: Ac4rMM//FnZzL+f2TX67H9zVPdX2bAA4dkwAAAAQQJA=
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:01 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367596FA1@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <006901ce2b39$e7ee2fc0$b7ca8f40$@augustcellars.com> <CABzCy2AxLChaj3Cjjvoio4_N7eoMiNZemC0yEUasnJMUKsP+EA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2AxLChaj3Cjjvoio4_N7eoMiNZemC0yEUasnJMUKsP+EA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.78]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367596FA1TK5EX14MBXC283r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(479174001)(243025002)(377454001)(189002)(199002)(16406001)(47976001)(46102001)(50986001)(71186001)(31966008)(79102001)(76482001)(20776003)(80022001)(77982001)(49866001)(54356001)(55846006)(81342001)(59766001)(63696002)(5343635001)(15202345001)(74502001)(74662001)(69226001)(44976002)(56776001)(47736001)(54316002)(65816001)(512954001)(33656001)(4396001)(16236675001)(51856001)(47446002)(5343655001)(53806001)(66066001)(56816002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB040; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0800C0C167
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Consensus calls
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:14 -0000

I would be highly surprised if Jim meant anything except http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-json-serialization-04 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jwe-json-serialization-04 for item 3 - especially since were the drafts referenced in your presentation at IETF 86.

                                                                -- Mike

From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:17 PM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Consensus calls

HI.

Could you please specify which drafts for item 3?

Nat
2013/3/28 Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com<mailto:ietf@augustcellars.com>>
<chair>

The following "decisions" were made at the face to face meeting.  This
message is to ratify these decisions on the list.  You have one week to
object and provide a solid defense of your objection or the actions will be
considered as adopted.  Note that for some of these we are running slightly
ahead of our charter changes but this is not expected to be a problem

1.  Adopt the proposed compromise language from John Bradley's presentation
dealing with the critical language.  This is to adopt points 1, 2, 3 and 4
but not point 5.  (presentation is available on the materials website
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/slides/slides-86-jose-4.pdf).

2.  The private fields of public/private key algorithms and the symmetric
key field are to be folded into the mail JWA draft.

3. The multiple recipient/signer serialization drafts are to be folded into
the JWE and JWS drafts respectively.

Jim


_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose



--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email