Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,

2

But keeping the "kid" header param


On 04/17/2013 08:40 AM, charles.marais@orange.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Retain the "x5c" header parameter in JWE.
>
> Br,
>
> Charles Marais.
> Le 12/04/2013 01:59, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit :
>> Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12> suggests removing 
>> the "x5c" header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for it 
>> has emerged.  The same logic may apply to other key specification 
>> parameters for JWE.
>>
>>
>> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
>>
>> 1.  Retain the "x5c" header parameter in JWE.
>>
>> 2. Remove the "x5c" header parameter (and possibly other related key 
>> specification parameters) from JWE.
>>
>> 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).
>>
>> 0.  I need more information to decide.
>>
>> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19^th or earlier.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
> -- 
>
> *MARAIS Charles*
> *FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED *
> Tel : 02.96.05.24.18
> charles.marais@orange.com <mailto:charles.marais@orange.com>
> WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex 
> - France
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose