Re: [jose] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ben Campbell <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>> I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in the
>> document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into the
>> registry as well when it is published.
>
>
> I agree . I didn't call that out because that one _was_ mentioned in the
> last call announcement.

Sorry to chime in late.  I thought this was covered in the shepherd
report, but didn't realize there were 2 downrefs.  What do I need to
do at this point?  We don't need to do another last call anymore,
right?  Sorry I am not remembering the new procedure.

Thanks,
Kathleen


>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.
>
>
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM
>>> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: [e-mail]; Jim Schaad
>>> <[e-mail]>;
>>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>>> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05:
>>> (with
>>> COMMENT)
>>>
>>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection
>>>
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email
>>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory
>>> paragraph, however.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>
>>>
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does not
>>> appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in the
>>> downref
>>> registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I
>>> don't suggest
>>> any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people
>>> hadn't already
>>> noticed.
>>>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen