Re: [jose] Calls for adoption: Web Proof Drafts

[Brent Kimberley <[e-mail]>]

I'm about a week late, but I feel compelled to ask...

Earlier this week or late last week, I saw what looked like a proposal to couple "strong" encryption with "weak" integrity.

If my memory serves me right: the proposal was along the lines of coupling:
ed448  with SHA-256  (as ed448 with SHA384)
ed22519 with SHA-128 (as opposed to SHA256)
And so on.

What was the decision / disposition?
Was it a strawman to stimulate discussion?

Best Regards,
Brent

From: Brent Zundel <[e-mail]>
Sent: March 29, 2023 10:18 AM
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue=[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [jose] Calls for adoption: Web Proof Drafts

I support adoption and volunteer to review and help write.

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: jose <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue=[e-mail]<mailto:odonoghue=[e-mail]>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 12:54:06 PM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [jose] Calls for adoption: Web Proof Drafts


jose working group...



Yesterday during the jose meeting @ IETF 116, we did a consensus call on the adoption of the three web proof drafts:

JSON Web Proofs https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-algorithms/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-algorithms%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbrent.zundel%40gendigital.com%7C04745884307c42d2641a08db2f401b19%7C94986b1d466f4fc0ab4b5c725603deab%7C0%7C0%7C638155724618796427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ao6ZkIxDgTl6KNHS2DLpMUKzM%2FoxxPnE8IrDlqBHdjU%3D&reserved=0>
JSON Proof Algorithms https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-algorithms/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-algorithms%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbrent.zundel%40gendigital.com%7C04745884307c42d2641a08db2f401b19%7C94986b1d466f4fc0ab4b5c725603deab%7C0%7C0%7C638155724618796427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ao6ZkIxDgTl6KNHS2DLpMUKzM%2FoxxPnE8IrDlqBHdjU%3D&reserved=0>
JSON Proof Token https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-token/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-jmiller-jose-json-proof-token%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbrent.zundel%40gendigital.com%7C04745884307c42d2641a08db2f401b19%7C94986b1d466f4fc0ab4b5c725603deab%7C0%7C0%7C638155724618796427%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Fg0FQk4Ss%2FrUUh1ZIPCgZSgs%2BMLvYnLgjj8%2FR%2BZNY48%3D&reserved=0>

The result was unanimous in favor of adopting the three drafts. With this message, I am asking the mailing list for any thoughts on adopting these three drafts. This call will close on Wednesday 19 April.



Also, this is an excellent time to read the drafts and start providing comments.



Karen (for the three jose chairs)

THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) ONLY AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER ANY RELEVANT PRIVACY LEGISLATION. No rights to any privilege have been waived. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy, taking of action in reliance on or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and delete or destroy all copies of this message.