IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: (with COMMENT)

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Tue, 30 September 2014 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB01A8760; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJqMg4pAJC4p; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7171A8759; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR03CA0027.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.96.26) by BLUPR03MB390.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.78.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1039.15; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:34:25 +0000
Received: from BL2FFO11FD027.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c09::142) by DM2PR03CA0027.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2428::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1039.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:34:25 +0000
Received: from mail.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1029.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:34:24 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC288.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.218]) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.86.9]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.002; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:43 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHP3ED6DaThHq3Jc02wWVkH58b9L5waAOjA
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:33:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BAA593D@TK5EX14MBXC288.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20140929235614.7335.28896.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140929235614.7335.28896.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.33]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BAA593DTK5EX14MBXC288r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(438002)(199003)(377454003)(52044002)(13464003)(189002)(43784003)(10300001)(55846006)(21056001)(64706001)(46102003)(20776003)(77096002)(71186001)(85306004)(76482002)(68736004)(81156004)(6806004)(230783001)(69596002)(33656002)(84326002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(95666004)(106466001)(106116001)(120916001)(66066001)(99396003)(80022003)(15975445006)(54356999)(19625215002)(76176999)(4396001)(2656002)(512874002)(31966008)(86362001)(50986999)(44976005)(26826002)(16236675004)(19300405004)(97736003)(19617315012)(85852003)(107046002)(92566001)(92726001)(86612001)(87936001)(15202345003)(84676001)(104016003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB390; H:mail.microsoft.com; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB390;
X-O365ENT-EOP-Header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0350D7A55D
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.37 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=131.107.125.37; helo=mail.microsoft.com;
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 131.107.125.37) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/RXvM_ChK-8K85So_YxCKz2-1gdY
Cc: "draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org>, "jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:34:32 -0000

Thanks for your review, Brian.  I’ve added the working group to the thread so they’re aware of your comments.  Replies are inline below…



-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Haberman [mailto:brian@innovationslab.net]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 4:56 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: (with COMMENT)



Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for

draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: No Objection



When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)





Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html

for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.





The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption/







----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENT:

----------------------------------------------------------------------



I agree with Alissa's Comment about the definitions.



Per my reply to Alissa, I propose to incorporate the applicable RFC 4949 definitions by reference.



                                                            Thanks again,

                                                            -- Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email