Re: [jose] Current Issue Status
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 17 September 2013 13:54 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EE411E823D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wm4NfXlnhB-Q for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8F11E8237 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.255.130.17] ([194.251.119.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm6IP-1VvXXD295t-00Zixa for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:54:30 +0200
Message-ID: <52385F0B.6070608@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:54:19 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <018801ceb312$fc346b00$f49d4100$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <018801ceb312$fc346b00$f49d4100$@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:RT+YrRmiMcZPyZqtOX0BO2xRdCa6ML7JLf+KMoVCcP0hyPd4j0f uSYoNqAxIWCTawxtbJ6IBli2y63TZSGoCqwVOkHel0juWZ5H1J8v75DEQ7HfCXiaigh6ANk rkIbkK99Z6bunKemHFv8FMmYVcEHfFMozrKXwPUP6ZRkMCQZfyS6mucv0ahmwkRwgzZx0m3 86pA82eikkR6VPRbIWK4A==
Cc: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net, jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Current Issue Status
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:54:40 -0000
Jim, when I look through the list of issues I wonder whether the group uses the issue tracker correctly. The large number of issues is just scary. There is an overhead with each created issue and if there are dependencies between issues or if an issue only consists of editorial aspects then the issue tracker might not be the right tool. I believe we also have to think about those who edit the documents and have to work with the issues. That's a huge amount of work. I wouldn't want to switch with Mike at the moment! Ciao Hannes On 16.09.2013 22:28, Jim Schaad wrote: > I have not had time to go through the database after the drafts have > come out. I did this when I was trying to get an agenda worked up so it > has my ideas of current states. > > I would like to review the key draft issues that Mike and I have not > gone through and see if there are any big controversies. > > Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > jose@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- [jose] Current Issue Status Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] Current Issue Status Hannes Tschofenig