[jose] Re: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms (Fully Specified Algorithms)

[Michael Jones <[e-mail]>]

I appreciate both of you pointing out inconsistencies in the document.  The editors will certainly fix those in the next draft.

				Thanks,
				-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Madden <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 11:20 PM
To: Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail]>
Cc: JOSE WG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: [jose] Re: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms (Fully Specified Algorithms)

As myself and Filip Skokan have pointed out, the wording of section 3.1 currently (I believe accidentally) outlaws all of the ECDH-ES encryption algorithms, and any future KEM-based algorithms. So no, even if you support the idea, the document is not ready. 

— Neil

> On 12 Sep 2024, at 17:48, Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail]> wrote:
> JOSE and COSE working group members,
> 
> This WGLC is currently scheduled to conclude on 13 September 
> (tomorrow). I am not currently comfortable with the number and clarity 
> of responses received. Please respond clearly indicating whether or 
> not you think this document is ready to proceed (pending the comments 
> raised in your response). To give you all a bit more time, I'm 
> extending the WGLC one week to next Friday (20 September 2024).
> 
> Please take a few minutes and review the updated draft!
> 
> Thanks,
> Karen
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:10 AM Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> JOSE working group members,
>> 
>> This email initiates a second working group last call for the Fully 
>> Specified Algorithms document:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
>> tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms%2
>> F&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cfd5f3330bd0e4b677dc908dcd3bc2cc0%7C84df9e7fe9f640
>> afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638618052360448442%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
>> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
>> %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MTq3s9c4XSjd%2FY9MX2hh%2FMR8fVFXKdYjXhvvwNM2%2BuE
>> %3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> The authors have updated the draft based on WGLC comments and 
>> discussions at IETF 120, and the chairs have polled the working group 
>> about the readiness for WGLC. Seeing no opposition, we've decided to 
>> proceed with a second WGLC.
>> 
>> Please review the document in detail and reply to this message 
>> (keeping the subject line intact) with your opinion on the readiness 
>> of this document for publication and any additional comments that you 
>> have.
>> 
>> This will be a three week WGLC. Please submit your responses by 13 
>> September 2024.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Karen (for the JOSE WG chairs)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]