[jose] update on Fully-Specified Algorithms draft (ready for second WGLC?)
Karen ODonoghue <kodonog@pobox.com> Fri, 09 August 2024 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <kodonog@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE19C14F713 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isxpyIceRigc for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE07C14F6FB for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ff4568676eso21029725ad.0 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723215505; x=1723820305; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=76VYQU6LfEJR3kDn7dG2xo37tmLqNZ+1uBehxMewHIo=; b=skjXjPkmJitX4749p5EYRlx+WkCgH4b160Ye96Y7Lemsi2rDLs2QtW5cjtTu7pRPDs zfi5/+TK52Tn0+1quGivfKeDRsnwJ0LNWP4dUcfaPXXX0y6w2TpC1XLzA84tSIqI+rue I8J/aU/JBBc/Yo0Zh3Imt5uvh7oexXrNLJag81moL5XzwHqkUqPkraAgq8j08unIOIiX lSVx3Pk/SnEnaSLYJQe+Cfb7S3q4aydl8yqiAeztdimwJnA4/CVM8uXWccEejFbFtr5x 5jOZwHdK/lnEhhdP1PVVS5aMX7wbuxBFnX8h/ERVL34rOC+SL0HzuUHfdQj71ygofeEF dZUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzBDTckeaZiHSUfs3H0VdSG3RldtIYHbFrWwn8avV2HJbnjBezQ kXD1auXizc715QzE8oX2nEhjgoItJ9Jva+1TWs+ymioANbp9YrsEXsFYiYANnAPLrUkbyhbU5nQ X2FsDUlB4hjGPEyHTQ2fb4q+hVM8lAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHVSdhkqSQlQZUQXW4BlxS2ug3ITUy59XkQmBxTI3oEMqTtJkEA5BKKv32l2rwFsL9YRa0WSnrAiYqpX5/2Gd8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c947:b0:200:aa78:cfc7 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-200ae4db8d6mr21249895ad.2.1723215505411; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Karen ODonoghue <kodonog@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:58:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+mgmiOKx2-YpCdh3hZ=7jR8pwfvU1j4zFvP4_gCX0feh6teUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: jose@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID-Hash: EE3YVXMRJ37IUAXACFF2NPPX77AO6IZV
X-Message-ID-Hash: EE3YVXMRJ37IUAXACFF2NPPX77AO6IZV
X-MailFrom: kodonog@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-jose.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [jose] update on Fully-Specified Algorithms draft (ready for second WGLC?)
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/UW4auV5HN1sRfUebg9-VE4QJZrU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jose-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jose-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jose-leave@ietf.org>
JOSE working group members, The authors of the Fully-Specified Algorithms draft believe that they have incorporated the feedback from IETF 120. We (the chairs) plan to start a second working group last call soon, but first, we'd like to confirm that those of you who have participated in the discussion thus far believe that the feedback was accurately incorporated. The draft is at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/ The notes from the discussion in Vancouver are: https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-120-jose?view The repo has been moved to the IETF JOSE working group repo at: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jose/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms Please respond by next Friday 18 August. The main question is: Have the authors done what was asked of them during the last WGLC and the Vancouver meeting? If not, what was missed? Detailed comments are also welcome. Karen
- [jose] update on Fully-Specified Algorithms draft… Karen ODonoghue
- [jose] Re: update on Fully-Specified Algorithms d… Filip Skokan