Re: [jose] updated draft charter text incorporating AD's comments

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

I have heard nothing to date, but I get Barry's point we need to reach 
out and ask.  As, I told him though we're going to reach out but we're 
not going to wait indefinitely for a reply.

spt

On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/5/13 6:29 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>> 2. (hard one) Barry's been told by some App folks who are working
>> on new JSON-based protocols that they don't see the applicability
>> of JOSE to their work.
>
> Have we heard *why*? Do they not need or want signing and encryption?
> Do they think there are technical problems with the solutions being
> proposed in the JOSE WG? Do they have aesthetic objections? It would
> help to know more about the concerns being expressed (and why they are
> not being expressed in the JOSE WG but instead in private to an area
> directory).
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRY1UoAAoJEOoGpJErxa2psRQP/jxDVhZEzKWJ7Lnz4zrbW9wu
> 266cYbY+XJxdqHHE0At4kVVPQ/YaV7wPUDOH9owCGLOgQeMGuT4NbaaHgwc5Uw9a
> RBuW0Aw6/otvdkDwHJWOI8jXgRF7ERUSoDAFYK8ynxY4l9ezngOzgWDpHQOK/tQD
> Bmr7+hqDJ4vcmklibH4lzHc/uk71d9hiE8PQE5S5KBeGKzWHwwcY8A1q8GKIFHKn
> eNVEu2yadXqZoFBggtDnAvOiMYN/5BQ3ck7dWWWNgY3ox3g9FHp1F31pJTUEPir/
> fgg7dCWQcwmf9UUujxWMDjbfTNvfO7hYPx2Pu1aL69XAQs0qp3eE6glPBs5Y18P8
> my8NiGcsCSQl6N3knapXCu1oLQ9BOO6qMRSAx7I839873eb7ZOK+5uDo39/gzt3K
> 8feRoNCj/nvhnHLFImQeyB6eGnaudiRyylOfuk6vVcg+ccqqepOATGK5mvgJxnRn
> 7yyVdgU6PcBvjnPJPHp8vObL9FHh+OJRUpozJS1pXHq4SZsIh14z3FYTQafx99XF
> YxAvAVMduLbw/+FMGCX42cv2rDUKWE3tShWNX2uLYacGmyysoKTqmx5xOx7+BdZQ
> WxCx1tPGVL1t11Ekgf6Ft3Lc94Kz06LqRD01wgAjIkpuhcDYREYoBXloE17qTz6y
> zTTNmlmmF9v3x8s9zDPt
> =NNLU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>