Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 July 2015 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2C71B2D14 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNEezBmyzJyt for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434531B2D15 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgef3 with SMTP id f3so110535057qge.0 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=H7LXOF7zu4GBE2NicJPVGkEcYteMdxUHuHvgwJxEhAU=; b=TrqM/N1sSEhQ73quUR34HCaflsufhBXpkI8d7bABE1J3pqrFxilmw3IWmgUMlJb/k4 bJTR5Y3Enb6eEHQfWc3wZ3g01WhbiX7F8qN6M+csDP+C49LefOk8lmwaIw4dfJrRXHdY Avv2NLbYSt22JljcmGvV102lCV/QpmTs/TEibF64P4TeFYFOU6gXkflum1zgLKaV5pOd PPQ+4zI3K3R1nCyJOiIMHaUvQrf41zvHvjPxhrXnzu3kX9YEFT0XhF8hRpHMB2Vj+TPr lWdvjean/l8H2InRGIVkNlu0P9tu51FTh66Teqkz2OoHsu6yecZy2k+mrMp7uRCo8uBI KPQA==
X-Received: by 10.55.50.78 with SMTP id y75mr53294444qky.31.1436811881471; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (209-6-114-252.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.114.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q68sm11361461qgd.42.2015.07.13.11.24.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3D1D86B0-1936-4D64-8210-1E84BD5FDD5D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To: <1984212955.1265704.1436807438162.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:24:40 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <9823EFCA-CE49-4AD5-BC6A-BCD15A1C765E@gmail.com>
References: <CABzCy2A_yxx+WFSLJiw5ZBPfGaR5de5Lf0uaPFbaMGOnzWSnpg@mail.gmail.com> <1984212955.1265704.1436807438162.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: Edmund Jay <ejay@mgi1.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/ZkwUSF7I1ymc9oqK9STYxxnz1Ls>
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:24:45 -0000

Hello,

It's good too see that a few people do support these drafts.  Will each of you be sending reviews and comments to the list shortly on these drafts?  If the chairs think it's reasonable to accept the drafts, they will also need to know there will be active support.

Thanks,
Kathleen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 13, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Edmund Jay <ejay@mgi1.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
> To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> 
> Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>; "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
> 
> Sorry to chime in so late. I have been completely under water for sometime now. 
> 
> Like Phil, I do see that draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options sort of thing can be very useful, though I may want to have slightly different way of encoding the things. Being able to do detached signature is quite attractive. 
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Nat
> 
> 2015-07-10 2:37 GMT+09:00 Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 
>> About https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00, I’ll add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard Barnes in JOSE Issues #26 “Allow for signature payload to not be base64 encoded” and #23 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 “Make crypto independent of binary encoding (base64)”.
>>  
>> About https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01, I’ll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue #2 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 “No key management for MAC”.
>>  
>> Also, there’s a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs going on in the COSE working group.  See the thread “[Cose] Key management for MACs (was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)” – especially https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4 and https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10.
>>  
>> One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management draft should be informed by the related decision in COSE.  Specifically, that if COSE decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning likely should apply to our decision on whether to define a standard mechanism for supporting key management for MACs in JOSE.
> Key management is explicitly out-of-scope for COSE as stated in the charter.  The discussion referenced had this point at the close of that discussion.
> 
> I'm not seeing much support for these drafts moving forward in JOSE.  I'm also not seeing enough to justify standards track and AD sponsored.  If you think these are important to have move forward in the WG or as standards track, please say so soon.  They can still go forward through the Independent submission process through the ISE.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kathleen 
> 
>>                                                             -- Mike
>>  
>> From: jose [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM
>> To: jose@ietf.org
>> Subject: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
>>  
>> Folks,
>>  
>> With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 July. 
>>  
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
>>  
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Karen
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
>