Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 06 July 2013 12:16 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC56421F9BA3 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 05:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.264, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DbvxUMkiNXja for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 05:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1B821F992E for <jose@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 05:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A89EF24082; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auQzERlmINGk; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:16:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.109] (pool-96-241-156-29.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.156.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4766CF2407C; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-294--331201459"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <008b01ce79c6$f5b30a00$e1191e00$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 08:16:29 -0400
Message-Id: <1707A939-9E92-43EB-B9E1-BC925600F8CF@vigilsec.com>
References: <008b01ce79c6$f5b30a00$e1191e00$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:16:39 -0000
In CMS, Peter Gutmann wrote RFC 6475 because he wanted a way to provide authenticated encryption on platforms that did not support AES-GCM or AES-CCM. I suggest that there are still many fewer of these platforms today, but there may still be a significant number of them. Having AES-CBC with HMAC seems like a good idea to me. Russ On Jul 5, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > Are we going to lobby to get this algorithm adopted as an algorithm by the WebCrypto group? > > Jim
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Richard Barnes
- [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Martin Thomson
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Russ Housley
- Re: [jose] AES+CBC algorithm Ryan Sleevi