Re: [jose] Consensus calls

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A03021F8521 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unoN-pqlyB6Z for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD82421F84DC for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id er20so152269lab.4 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mjRCwulDM3cDFcb/P16O9J4rr4c2J4FwmJZNrPloOuY=; b=Clx1B0QZ0a27vyyHxjtf/ufkbSpBCH0u8UVsyhnjL96xOdANgr7FkXqHftLKUE2Uag VgtQxHo51FOziosaV7M3ETHJJ5wQCmTFvstp6OIp/9RxpBnFReUemwQWMFa9cOhDFe9J F/Mt9tIM7/BOnHUWI80t3OPAvs4aEaTkWVkGne+JFlilffAL7HZPduDXk7jnim+qmUMT T59v30MtOY2c3xsdxqxKojwnvuvrNJZ4xHhFi8Vh+7VM+ywW8qymPUpHpZmeUsxed3yI cCTFzlCYnE+4jRfNB4xDOTf0Wv6ZppMaMMpd7HYMPpivyi+l99gXfRelpsQrOu9hgEC/ g4Hw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.73 with SMTP id v9mr298782laz.2.1364517075684; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.103.202 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367596FA1@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <006901ce2b39$e7ee2fc0$b7ca8f40$@augustcellars.com> <CABzCy2AxLChaj3Cjjvoio4_N7eoMiNZemC0yEUasnJMUKsP+EA@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367596FA1@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:31:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CABzCy2Db5O-2WAYDEvumS51ALGxJaHO1RCrr9c5GTf0WJB4oig@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c34d9a96153a04d90563f8"
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Consensus calls
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:31:18 -0000

That's what I thought, but wanted to be sure, especially for the people who
was not at the F2F.


2013/3/29 Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>

>  I would be highly surprised if Jim meant anything except
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-json-serialization-04 and
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jwe-json-serialization-04 for
> item 3 - especially since were the drafts referenced in your presentation
> at IETF 86.****
>
> ** **
>
>                                                                 -- Mike***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Nat Sakimura
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:17 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* jose@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [jose] Consensus calls****
>
> ** **
>
> HI. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Could you please specify which drafts for item 3? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Nat****
>
> 2013/3/28 Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>****
>
> <chair>
>
> The following "decisions" were made at the face to face meeting.  This
> message is to ratify these decisions on the list.  You have one week to
> object and provide a solid defense of your objection or the actions will be
> considered as adopted.  Note that for some of these we are running slightly
> ahead of our charter changes but this is not expected to be a problem
>
> 1.  Adopt the proposed compromise language from John Bradley's presentation
> dealing with the critical language.  This is to adopt points 1, 2, 3 and 4
> but not point 5.  (presentation is available on the materials website
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/slides/slides-86-jose-4.pdf).
>
> 2.  The private fields of public/private key algorithms and the symmetric
> key field are to be folded into the mail JWA draft.
>
> 3. The multiple recipient/signer serialization drafts are to be folded into
> the JWE and JWS drafts respectively.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)****
>
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en****
>



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en