Re: [jose] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with COMMENT)

[Jim Schaad <[e-mail]>]

I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in the document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into the registry as well when it is published.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; Jim Schaad <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does not
> appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in the downref
> registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I don't suggest
> any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people hadn't already
> noticed.
>