[jose] Re: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms (Fully Specified Algorithms)

[Neil Madden <[e-mail]>]

As myself and Filip Skokan have pointed out, the wording of section 3.1 currently (I believe accidentally) outlaws all of the ECDH-ES encryption algorithms, and any future KEM-based algorithms. So no, even if you support the idea, the document is not ready. 

— Neil

> On 12 Sep 2024, at 17:48, Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail]> wrote:
> JOSE and COSE working group members,
> 
> This WGLC is currently scheduled to conclude on 13 September
> (tomorrow). I am not currently comfortable with the number and clarity
> of responses received. Please respond clearly indicating whether or
> not you think this document is ready to proceed (pending the comments
> raised in your response). To give you all a bit more time, I'm
> extending the WGLC one week to next Friday (20 September 2024).
> 
> Please take a few minutes and review the updated draft!
> 
> Thanks,
> Karen
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:10 AM Karen ODonoghue <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> JOSE working group members,
>> 
>> This email initiates a second working group last call for the Fully
>> Specified Algorithms document:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/
>> 
>> The authors have updated the draft based on WGLC comments and
>> discussions at IETF 120, and the chairs have polled the working group
>> about the readiness for WGLC. Seeing no opposition, we've decided to
>> proceed with a second WGLC.
>> 
>> Please review the document in detail and reply to this message
>> (keeping the subject line intact) with your opinion on the readiness
>> of this document for publication and any additional comments that you
>> have.
>> 
>> This will be a three week WGLC. Please submit your responses by 13
>> September 2024.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Karen (for the JOSE WG chairs)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]