IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] TTL for JWK

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BA21F8C5D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZf7kFM341AK for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog101.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0130221F8C54 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f198.google.com ([209.85.223.198]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob101.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUSVkZ+bNx2sgbiqsmgaeizG65E2iGgQV@postini.com; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:52 PST
Received: by mail-ie0-f198.google.com with SMTP id 17so40343556iea.9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=p8DW4eP5aCeSg+LLPPLeKP8RGdG21fX4CI4h8Bd/U4I=; b=a3VMdpJ6b0u8ecBnQmBT0NG7057RRZXCmtv9YYqjIXWDO0DpiaZJDvcaxzYUv4Db8H imuNcBoVVdY3XeF0Xlk0C83yQWoNEAR677fHOvB3U/+K43e0LKp0OycvGvjokmB5OjX1 MYJUrHYY9CgRvovbTnlCBQCjDozBT8J5p4NC4ugaM1GVklLaN7nZgJ/Ung0OIIDEop6X zmy1quOVM0G1e+f9PCoxbY9NlapAbpioFMt6js+p0zt9pkvTKVlIojF/f0wQmx+xa3hw Mxa9bLCajXRx9jlV2mG/2Y937lerAM6bwkAU28T89co+pRe9gTWydqskyxDcBm88T4JQ DPqg==
X-Received: by 10.50.56.141 with SMTP id a13mr11806108igq.24.1361405031242; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.56.141 with SMTP id a13mr11806104igq.24.1361405031118; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.63.3 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:03:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E11507634D16@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <CA+k3eCTZ4KeC7ZH41OWkjkLCp0RiRBkze=4NpFO7AG5zVq-bJQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394367477CB0@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CA+k3eCTbKzWaSr0cmSKTgfs2WMwfGjxatCMjFJekf+8E5SRjXQ@mail.gmail.com> <84EEBC7B-1C68-485E-998D-D01CAE884675@ve7jtb.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E115076349DB@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <CA+k3eCR4eX7fk3ibra97hcJ9jpEMWxhJZhb4E2RFbSP8ogui9A@mail.gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E11507634D16@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:03:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQ=5amcD1ihsK1oZJ2q12Z=D0k7a2m8Xa9upgN0xyGyLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0401f53d46764d04d630cf78"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkH7dZUdtBQqLrGEytOkuymQVmb1xfg5eqze+EZfW4CeiQmz93WjyBg12B1d4+08zxmUNQBosNNChdBKu9anFe2SkhpfowaTdSxJpvb1mB+E38Ao1LmG/I+0mLNIGAO4lnuB7xf
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] TTL for JWK
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:03:53 -0000

Doh, you got me with an RTFID!  ;)

I guess it's safe to say my nascent JOSE implementation doesn't enforce the
MUST-understand for JWK. Actually, it doesn't for anything at the moment.
For whatever that's worth...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email