Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 11 February 2013 15:56 UTC

Message-ID: <511914C7.40101@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:56:55 -0500
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436741E22F@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436741E22F@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080903070601050903080400"
Subject: Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality
Precedence: list

On 2/7/13 9:05 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> I agree that this should be described in the document.
> One common application that uses discovery/negotiation to decide what 
> algorithms are supported and to use is TLS (https).
> Cheers,
> -- Mike
>
That's not quite accurate. TLS specifies mandatory to implement algs. 
Clients and servers can
use the handshake to discover/negotiate algs, but they always know that 
the mandatory to implement
algs are available.

Steve

Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Edmund Jay
[jose] POLL(s): header criticality Karen O'Donoghue
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Anthony Nadalin
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality John Bradley
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Matt Miller (mamille2)
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Mike Jones
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Dick Hardt
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Breno de Medeiros
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Breno de Medeiros
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality George Fletcher
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Dick Hardt
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality sebastien.brault
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Mike Jones
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Brian Campbell
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Nat Sakimura
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Richard Barnes
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Eric Rescorla
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Peter Yee
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Axel.Nennker
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality hideki nara
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Ryo Ito
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Roland Hedberg
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Mike Jones
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality charles.marais@orange.com
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Casper Biering
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Manger, James H
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Stephen Kent
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Mike Jones
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Richard Barnes
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Mike Jones
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality nov matake
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Andreas Åkre Solberg
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Prateek Mishra
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Richard Barnes
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Salvatore D'Agostino
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Chuck Mortimore
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Torsten Lodderstedt
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Russ Housley
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality Stephen Kent
Re: [jose] POLL(s): header criticality HAYASHI, Tatsuya