Re: [jose] Consensus calls

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB49F21F8BBC for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6yaBDYUGG0Q for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252721F8B64 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (mail.augustcellars.com [50.34.17.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CFA82CA00 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <006901ce2b39$e7ee2fc0$b7ca8f40$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <006901ce2b39$e7ee2fc0$b7ca8f40$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:48:05 -0700
Message-ID: <017901ce318e$dc7c6520$95752f60$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIVtGiZD+ejgU/m+d7nyMc0S6wm15g3tIoQ
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [jose] Consensus calls
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:48:45 -0000

<chair>

I have not seen any objections to these resolutions.  The document editors
should therefore act on them.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Jim
> Schaad
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:25 PM
> To: jose@ietf.org
> Subject: [jose] Consensus calls
> 
> <chair>
> 
> The following "decisions" were made at the face to face meeting.  This
> message is to ratify these decisions on the list.  You have one week to
object
> and provide a solid defense of your objection or the actions will be
> considered as adopted.  Note that for some of these we are running
slightly
> ahead of our charter changes but this is not expected to be a problem
> 
> 1.  Adopt the proposed compromise language from John Bradley's
> presentation dealing with the critical language.  This is to adopt points
1, 2, 3
> and 4 but not point 5.  (presentation is available on the materials
website
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/slides/slides-86-jose-4.pdf).
> 
> 2.  The private fields of public/private key algorithms and the symmetric
key
> field are to be folded into the mail JWA draft.
> 
> 3. The multiple recipient/signer serialization drafts are to be folded
into the
> JWE and JWS drafts respectively.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose