Re: [jose] How would x5u really be used with JWE?

Ok, that sort of makes sense.  

Note that in that case, there's no point to sending a cert chain ('x5c'), since it's the recipient's cert you're talking about.  Even 'x5u' is kind of overkill; all you really need is 'x5t'.

On Jan 25, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

> They're there exactly to let the recipient known which private key to use for decryption.  Hardly useless...
> 
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 8:36 AM
> To: Brian Campbell
> Cc: jose@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [jose] How would x5u really be used with JWE?
> 
> AFAICT, the X.509 fields in JWE are pretty useless.
> 
> If you're using key transport (i.e., wrapping the symmetric key in a public key), then you would use the "jwk" or "jku" fields to reference the key pair you used to do the wrapping.  The only function of the public key crypto fields in a JWE is to let the recipient know which private key to use for decryption.  The recipient already needs to have the private key, since it obviously won't be in the message.
> 
> The question of how the encrypting party figures out which public key to use for a given recipient (and in particular, roll-over), is an application-layer question, not something that JWE would address.  See the XMPP end-to-end security doc for an example; they use a separate exchange to associate a JWK with an XMPP ID.
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-xmpp-e2e>
> 
> --Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> 
>> Is there a concrete use case for this that someone could explain to me?
>> 
>> How does an encrypting party know what URL to use to get the key to encrypt? I assume some out-of-band exchange. How would key rolling work then? An an encrypting party would need to a priori know all potential x5u's of the decrypting party? Which seems dubious. And how would the decrypting party signal a desired change of keys?  
>> 
>> Am I missing something obvious here?  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose