Re: [jose] JWK-specific key fingerprints?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 12 February 2013 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC38721F8DC2 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5TNh40l2wPk for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C6921F8DC9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ez12so588227wid.0 for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UNUcJnG2gY1p2oBNnJizU1zQaeA7ttB7/Fb3xDHRqJQ=; b=qbBF/fkt9Ko2yTDBAqCjeK5OWOU/1gAy5jSpAjGiGTaD5i8KUg/OBEcICe3vIjbkoJ U5zizkYzjEu0I8blMyOcN4vBtBfPthR+Ty1q58oXtsTszKy9dq4OcyQY9gTNadPZmbpQ +5q1TqADJYK2QWU8AXKBzKQbqMileq4uGZm7mJ5jez26D+4fuBy6BW2lPrLtcx1h78nm DWguTea53NBbUiq+aGYQNfpdwKca5x4P+CaHHulaE3AxU/v0Pdx2Wwy0udNEsNxpsnRw UlZXATcl3w3whKdN21pBWG8HeNi5CduReG4gs3B4th2pMm32/EPYC8W68Mxu3qVB7vqs OkHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.80.35 with SMTP id o3mr5682123wix.9.1360698780628; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.5.135 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG8k2+4xaAUBPs=Kw-=eBHZNyOMs6VYByPEb1jnAv1aGjLupng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG8k2+4xaAUBPs=Kw-=eBHZNyOMs6VYByPEb1jnAv1aGjLupng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:53:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWzdoo6b0ZymF0cv_v9zOjJKTWuUhkWuxiA-cM9qgu0jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Holth <dholth@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: jose <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] JWK-specific key fingerprints?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:53:09 -0000

On 12 February 2013 10:56, Daniel Holth <dholth@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... canonical json ....

Isn't mention of canonical JSON a swear-jar offense?  Something needs
canonicalization, but JSON seems a poor candidate.