IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com> Thu, 02 July 2015 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42121A8A8F for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4c3dq3nSaLs for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4895F1A8A8E for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbpo10 with SMTP id po10so38305851lbb.3 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pA5grjsGd4SqRKr9XyibF/ImCEC/wjy8DfO/Aoa35rM=; b=w/VVelznw5x0nf737BvoUGwQ+sP/7UuYxFIyaoN+3xBdtqOreub0Yqo4gUwaj06tYA LMnubUndSsrEX3vRfFBiJgVf8j3RXWV0vMPluAMvTxwn6ObyJnUlYbT9HkFL0YPTKNpg kyc+VmCIH5LtMGHMJnUQW61/CoeiW/WtxO1Nv4/EgLlxgB+3e3cHMUVriPCDkv2gXS41 L3+0Qys5XojsRX6lFt0H7+9dCJT+1wR1t/hlQ++1Da2cGXULWtzBjFzGxhkqyHAgoWsK Uh5RAAIje5FTi4PPg+vtWZJLSGKlNeeOt3BvLBnlhnUBu3kTQHE2W80InNLvGRl+46W3 Su1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.197.2 with SMTP id iq2mr32420850lac.103.1435866749770; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.203.163 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8FF9C9E8-7259-4818-ADC2-8D70E4FBB9E9@isoc.org>
References: <8FF9C9E8-7259-4818-ADC2-8D70E4FBB9E9@isoc.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:52:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: j20ZMubBgXKKxLKe7ivWRL13UEY
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhH6jV+SJ_fhB4y2Rez9tuNcnLa6pRiOVMFxKojsWwUZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11340b0690a15b0519e9c740"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/qpC7TEmhksNAZ-cbgXxVBASstHM>
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:52:33 -0000

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
wrote:

>  Folks,
>
>  With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two
> remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include:
> 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual
> drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your
> thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would
> like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15
> July.
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt
>


I would very much like us to avoid the need to base64 encode payloads in
protocols like ACME. HTTP is 8 bit clean by design and thus no need to base
64.

So I support draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00 going forward on
standards track.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email