Re: [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fields
"jose issue tracker" <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 24 April 2013 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7178D21F896D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwxbIZD3rENO for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89BF21F8738 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51455 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1UV4c6-0007KN-AP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:40:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org, michael.jones@microsoft.com
X-Trac-Project: jose
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:40:18 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/jose/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/6#comment:2
Message-ID: <069.9e749f14b7284fa44bae26e9db99e999@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <054.162afb78c358483db55af2b36ee8f61d@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 6
In-Reply-To: <054.162afb78c358483db55af2b36ee8f61d@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption@tools.ietf.org, michael.jones@microsoft.com, jose@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: ekr@rtfm.com, jhildebr@cisco.com, mbj@microsoft.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130424184023.C89BF21F8738@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:40:23 -0700
Resent-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fields
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:40:24 -0000
#6: Unclear requirements levels on fields Comment (by michael.jones@microsoft.com): As part of the resolution to the "must understand" issue, draft-ietf-jose- json-web-signature-09 and draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-09 now say which fields are required and optional under what circumstances. Furthermore, for algorithms requiring the use of specific additional header parameter fields, draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-09 clearly calls those fields out. Therefore, I believe that this issue should be closed. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-jose-json-web- rbarnes@bbn.com | encryption@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: json-web- | Version: encryption | Resolution: Severity: Active WG | Document | Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/6#comment:2> jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
- [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fields jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fie… jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fie… jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #6: Unclear requirements levels on fie… jose issue tracker