[jose] Re: Do you need the JWP JSON Serialization?

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Trying to take a bit of learning from history - the many JSON
serializations for JWS and JWE have, to the best of my knowledge, been very
scantily used or implemented in comparison to the popular compact
serializations. As such, I don't believe the JWP JSON Serialization is
needed.

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:42 PM Michael Jones <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> I’m writing to ask whether any of you have a use case that requires the
> JSON Web Proof JSON Serialization? Unless concrete reasons are provided to
> keep it, we propose to make the Compact Serialization the only JSON
> Serialization for JWPs.  This is being tracked at
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-jose/json-web-proof/issues/100.
>
>
>
> Responses saying “I don’t need the JSON Serialization” are also welcomed.
>
>
>
> (A CBOR serialization is planned of course – something we hope to create
> before IETF 121 in Dublin, building on the work to use binary fields values
> in computations that we did prior to Vancouver.)
>
>
>
>                                                                 Thanks,
>
>                                                                 -- Mike &
> DW
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._