Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

Javier Rojas Blum <javier@gluu.org> Fri, 19 April 2013 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <javier@gluu.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13A41F0D11 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Ih6BQOxb+-M for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway06.websitewelcome.com (gateway06.websitewelcome.com [69.93.179.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776F81F0D10 for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 126EB2B1D769; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:20:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator405.hostgator.com (gator405.hostgator.com [184.172.165.9]) by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0409E2B1D72F for <jose@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:20:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [190.186.177.27] (port=41237 helo=localhost.localdomain) by gator405.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <javier@gluu.org>) id 1UT1sU-0007cl-FI; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:20:46 -0500
Message-ID: <5170B80D.5070908@gluu.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:20:45 -0400
From: Javier Rojas Blum <javier@gluu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "charles.marais@orange.com" <charles.marais@orange.com>
References: <51674E63.3050809@isoc.org> <516E97DE.3050507@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <516E97DE.3050507@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070008050100090403000704"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator405.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gluu.org
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (localhost.localdomain) [190.186.177.27]:41237
X-Source-Auth: javier+gluu.org
X-Email-Count: 7
X-Source-Cap: ZGlnaW1vbjtkaWdpbW9uO2dhdG9yNDA1Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:20:49 -0000

1

Yes, Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than 
the JWS and JWE headers are important.
Also they should be included in the examples in the spec.


On 04/17/2013 08:38 AM, charles.marais@orange.com wrote:
> 1.Yes, Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other 
> than JWS and JWE headers are important.
>
> Charles Marais.
> Le 12/04/2013 01:59, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit :
>> Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15 
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15>. suggests 
>> requiring that a key indicator, such as a "kid" field, be required in 
>> all JWS and JWE headers.Are use cases where key information is 
>> exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
>>
>> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
>>
>> 1.  Yes.
>>
>> 2. No.
>>
>> 0.  I need more information to decide.
>>
>> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19^th (or earlier).
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
> -- 
>
> *MARAIS Charles*
> *FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED *
> Tel : 02.96.05.24.18
> charles.marais@orange.com <mailto:charles.marais@orange.com>
> WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex 
> - France
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose