[jose] Signature algorithm "none"
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 31 July 2013 12:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735A121F9E43 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uy9FB8qUrSBW for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (mail-oa0-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0E121F853A for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so1389180oag.1 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=faDUb6gADB1su3YSczYGJHT1YxrFLHmBvyJHOQ3cE1w=; b=oFH3ybvyds//kkuIsjN2qarP15x/Wi1MC84DakpRBOuvfrjzfzORD2ZUl5PnZAk694 1mZKp0pIxhseEAfhwODnAENEYC8KqxLFQlir/LZvuJJbxQTUrx/Pg+lb/MugFN0/gKSJ yV3r6irJMZ90NOxjqMKuHaYfcCH9ApazeF4UxEY0942mZdcGoHIy8ahow2B7VjmDigqo quzRiBfHEN8stiqIU1PJtXZfnmyxG79l629m/t4mpKZNK0mjhxm1lDum/0CS8pP+Mw3K 38YE5JPq95EX9vb6iknHk/LEyrImWcsvTMQjRhGaBUxprRp8XAbn3IFkAVDTTUccJIiq RxGw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.205.138 with SMTP id lg10mr60438888obc.6.1375274754010; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.26.135 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [128.89.255.32]
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:45:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQUmNqq62S553muLz3L8Xk9tT1W_jR7j3fHXEhH4wvoVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c290b82e8f8204e2ce1b39"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTVFoaYBqEnXQza//+tEaoL4qOPadcvSE1WGsyZ202Q4Tbpe084Sl0k0JJ/iiY66KhFSh5
Subject: [jose] Signature algorithm "none"
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:46:35 -0000
What's the use case for this? Can we delete it?
- [jose] Signature algorithm "none" Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" Mike Jones
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" John Bradley
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" Richard Barnes
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" nov matake
- Re: [jose] Signature algorithm "none" Brian Campbell