Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

["Jim Schaad" <[e-mail]>]

 

 

From: Richard Barnes [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: Jim Schaad; The IESG; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

 

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Section 8.
> "[TBD]@ietf.org"
> This needs to be populated before approval.  I don't know what's customary
> here, but "[e-mail]" is an obvious candidate.
>
> [JLS] If this is going to be an IANA moderated list, then it should be
> filled in by IANA at the time of publishing and not now.  I believe that was
> the original intent.

IANA does not moderate lists, and almost all of these sorts of lists
live on ietf.org.  You're even asking for this one to be on ietf.org
(not on iana.org)  There's no reason for IANA to care what list is
used; they will simply track whether the review was posted, and will
interact with the DE.

 

Barry: Would [e-mail] be a sensible thing to put here? 

 

[JLS] I don’t have any objections to using [e-mail].  However the original discussions for this was it would be some type of “expert review” list similar to the mime-types list.  I don’t know that the jose list would provide the same semantics.