Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E691A90F5; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyeSBHU9_hHI; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815E41A90F3; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (winery.augustcellars.com [206.212.239.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B47E738F58; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: "'Richard Barnes'" <rlb@ipv.sx>, "'Barry Leiba'" <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20141002023359.19368.17933.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0fb901cfddf2$5e21c7d0$1a655770$@augustcellars.com> <CALaySJKuYDiZFBY8Q6XR2bj7kj=x6OkEf29cD_CruVPXERw+ig@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSsshCsa944ZbY71FQ=ZC+PoRzUKzEJNn9KpesR92WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSsshCsa944ZbY71FQ=ZC+PoRzUKzEJNn9KpesR92WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:52:00 -0700
Message-ID: <10d001cfde69$9181f7e0$b485e7a0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_10D1_01CFDE2E.E5251BB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIgq7eoql4biEyUw+dKWaWWQvbAGwJKjdHIAisT6RcBvRqM35tJ5X+Q
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/wwjDJwh0NUcBISy4botXt9v_Lzk
Cc: jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:54:40 -0000

 

 

From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rlb@ipv.sx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: Jim Schaad; The IESG; jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org; jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

 

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> Section 8.
> "[TBD]@ietf.org"
> This needs to be populated before approval.  I don't know what's customary
> here, but "jose@ietf.org" is an obvious candidate.
>
> [JLS] If this is going to be an IANA moderated list, then it should be
> filled in by IANA at the time of publishing and not now.  I believe that was
> the original intent.

IANA does not moderate lists, and almost all of these sorts of lists
live on ietf.org.  You're even asking for this one to be on ietf.org
(not on iana.org).  There's no reason for IANA to care what list is
used; they will simply track whether the review was posted, and will
interact with the DE.

 

Barry: Would jose@ietf.org be a sensible thing to put here? 

 

[JLS] I don’t have any objections to using jose@ietf.org.  However the original discussions for this was it would be some type of “expert review” list similar to the mime-types list.  I don’t know that the jose list would provide the same semantics.