Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 02 October 2014 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857781A0114; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUUlaC9mENAs; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E091A0113; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gq15so1756644lab.26 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 00:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BNLxCmX0NWwQ1Q6qKE3MHBOma5JF/41QSCidDWBV5ko=; b=eRhIZT2s2N9MZk8AByKdscAA0I7pdm3Z1jUu9KR4Qno2MX8GWlKLoKaj+/Tkc6LkzA ZLtONqYDCZOX0octGg0OOHO/pcJ4XZKYEjJ5Zp75P+zMRfT6QP4YJoZS/q4QCFtCMphv roJoFIKa6QNmHWC1DL3uNMF34FSfP4V2E3pBP7dsiPoGVaw1m4yKRfpUxA1hoY+TgVal +ssgCpE+NqQ/hMHgPWff6wPvIc8cy4n4DOeAxkiniqFb7Oz7vhb7rl1H362DHGj4PWCy bou43gyaBthdDK7EMezr/iB3Qv2e9JZUrKHi7WNfEYQTnNVA3Y9JQc0B6qjADQ0eQqb9 CS3g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.205.39 with SMTP id ld7mr56788645lbc.40.1412233397087; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 00:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.1.193 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSsshCsa944ZbY71FQ=ZC+PoRzUKzEJNn9KpesR92WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141002023359.19368.17933.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0fb901cfddf2$5e21c7d0$1a655770$@augustcellars.com> <CALaySJKuYDiZFBY8Q6XR2bj7kj=x6OkEf29cD_CruVPXERw+ig@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSsshCsa944ZbY71FQ=ZC+PoRzUKzEJNn9KpesR92WU5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 03:03:17 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pTHMeyZR2IU_4XiNHE0YY57EU5o
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ8nXOcHXE_ku80EVgvc2gZMx7THaqcZJKWCvADdiKEEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c41af933af05046b3590
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/yP_40R55HLgO97-C4r8TLOY7jTM
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <jose-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:03:20 -0000

On Thursday, October 2, 2014, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','barryleiba@computer.org');>> wrote:
>
>> > Section 8.
>> > "[TBD]@ietf.org"
>> > This needs to be populated before approval.  I don't know what's
>> customary
>> > here, but "jose@ietf.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jose@ietf.org');>" is an obvious candidate.
>> >
>> > [JLS] If this is going to be an IANA moderated list, then it should be
>> > filled in by IANA at the time of publishing and not now.  I believe
>> that was
>> > the original intent.
>>
>> IANA does not moderate lists, and almost all of these sorts of lists
>> live on ietf.org.  You're even asking for this one to be on ietf.org
>> (not on iana.org).  There's no reason for IANA to care what list is
>> used; they will simply track whether the review was posted, and will
>> interact with the DE.
>
>
> Barry: Would jose@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jose@ietf.org');>
> be a sensible thing to put here?
>

I think it would, and we've done that with other WG lists, such as
vcarddav.  But it depends upon what's going to happen to the WG: if it's
likely to live a long time yet, and they expect significant activity for
registration reviews, they might not want those distracting the WG from
it's work.

I doubt that would be an issue for JOSE, but I can't really say for sure.

Barry