Re: [jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting

Dear chairs,

As I suggested earlier, I think we should organize this meeting around the
few big questions we need to get resolved, from which the answers to
individual issues will follow.  So I would like to propose that we
re-organize the agenda in the following way:

1. Mon. AM: Which fields are required / how to handle pre-negotiation?
2. Mon. PM: How should header parameter integrity protection be done?
3. Tue. AM: How should we do key wrapping, for JWE, JWS, and beyond?
4. Tue. PM: Review / close issues and wrap up

Also, Based on some side discussions, I've put together some slides that
try to summarize the state of the art and proposals for (2).
<
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HlBYEiwBFYUBA5751Q8U1GXD-W0cgdCZwpVMRdUkK2c/edit?usp=sharing
>

Thanks,
--Richard

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

> The chairs have posted their first cut at an agenda for the Interim
> meeting.****
>
> ** **
>
> It can be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2013/04/29/jose/agenda/agenda-interim-2013-jose-1
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Jim****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>