Re: [Json] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 09 April 2014 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D4B1A03F7; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbVGhRdFIpZK; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95B71A03D5; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s39HBVaW054955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:11:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-175.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.175] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140408162237.4321.65178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:11:29 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E04610FE-9E32-4B3C-A9C9-A0B46F0133D3@vpnc.org>
References: <20140408162237.4321.65178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/-WwXU2ZTW-uzKxeLuvQ4uN4FDo4
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:11:39 -0000

On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-json-01-01: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-json/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I wish all charters were this short. I salute you all.
> 
> I looked at the draft that will be used as a starting point, and didn't
> see a list of interoperability issues ("what problem are we trying to
> solve?"). 
> 
> Are those issues well known in the community, so there's no reason to
> write them down?
> 
> Is anyone likely to raise issues that aren't addressed in the current
> draft?

Wearing my chair hat:

- The current draft discusses each interoperability problem it addresses, but not as a single list at the front.

- We have no idea if people will bring up new issues for the draft, but of course it is fine if they do.

--Paul Hoffman