Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 02 September 2019 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CC51201AA
for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S8r5nfSZPpaI for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de
[134.102.50.17])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36D0112020A
for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCCB9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[84.141.204.185])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46MjfL3bCdzyyw;
Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:20:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190902211744.GA7920@localhost>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:20:10 +0200
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>,
Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 589152008.5743639-e3bac0de17e3f45e45cf446bce809a54
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2619B2B5-C241-4CBA-854F-8A30CD4A8DF8@tzi.org>
References: <cc3dc24d-3e13-e319-e48f-7b52ddd017d0@gmail.com>
<00231270-86DF-4AD2-949E-25B04D518577@tzi.org>
<20190902211744.GA7920@localhost>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/0gwgO4Bt83_0fdsPw3iYFOH2GfE>
Subject: Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>,
<mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>,
<mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 21:20:27 -0000
On Sep 2, 2019, at 23:17, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > > But first we should find what the consensus is. Has there been a > consensus call on this? This is not a consensus document. Grüße, Carsten
- [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 John Levine
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] In "praise" of UTF-16 Anders Rundgren