Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 09 December 2017 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D061286AB; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 21:00:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrlyIWhowbh7; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 21:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE22120726; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 21:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.68.121]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3igT-1fE7jF2o09-00rKf2; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 06:00:00 +0100
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, json@ietf.org
Cc: jsonbis-chairs@ietf.org
References: <150669032129.14118.1441258768913961205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <14b239c8-e17c-0ca2-561b-83b2bbd57516@gmx.de> <0a167b10-bb3b-7bac-2906-63c459230645@isode.com> <e986c580-b6df-3736-ebed-4b06d761853c@gmx.de> <1510238425.3520771.1167030728.53A2E4C7@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <a5e7b81b-0596-26b5-48cb-22fde33825e8@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 06:00:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1510238425.3520771.1167030728.53A2E4C7@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GQfaR8xyBahKIfCx516UCRyArs/6YWQajKYM/0e7pHw7IFj/yUs 4ucmbuU26yhRKiEIZ2A/NNwATkHS5bVK/1404TinUKksJrL80qagFt5aznIXFochkQK7ErD lUF8tpytEAhB5lX59R6qU5PbTaAXlghMqno+f7HoUoGVQLNsdrsTC+YrFOAt8R5SvBPvG7r AOLwI1zcRYFAvKvGtWEfw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kuFJJMvsZFc=:yqsjbVazJNKfXlARuKN9M/ sIHfO4kLrh/aNrdBtXqSzQ7APREfEMuHlfXhJ4M1Kw7SrGLTIRIoNJdkzULWxL73fOcbFxnfb toZLkHY5oshOxzAr5i2rE/EMwVNYcMrF3biF4V+wEC3mtOrusCWBVoFPo+AUqpya3N2wCGyw4 d+K/zI417Z0llXBOupjIebVEpNz3dCI4ta1JgmI44/59hkLHyb8OCTKbvuc4/OzIzu7me7AJr GCu+hjdZx+DAAQvigaRz1zvDnz6ploW2hWYTITIEQtaNJXpOozyycdGY+Y4IcT+O9MhhLNg5F BWjg6qu8nLhJEDuOCUGpAKpwuPoaZbNYdlh27yoUlH8hTiURrnsFUnt8SR+VxETW05QdC+L1e LZPKAoo8r1LeX7TiQPN691UcPVBirrwIDRbwktEvWcIVRNxYCS7p2yz25BdHmrzPabC57gqNH j3okSAkM9dyOZQXWBfKxAThu0nf/bbCeDN1Ldhwb090NKRTKelbM+vlZqsP2QN4+rWVkaQ07Z z550vJvUpqHK8EIMEeTciBQ51y2tw6ee4EYJkO55k96B0pRev6n0EGDC1VY+AMcVfCihR5mfO ROYZqMkEwVSb6Hnlpq+Y4ceDUt3gZ7FnbgUX51eiBMWcNwGSgJfdHAsogxfpw9GBlVkLCm1pZ PdyyAjRdHLFPdFs3yJOI7Xr9zO8BBs0ym02pQ9DnKKvadjrz9tk01E25XRN969DV/QpKnZV94 VIUm4KtRNqrDdQ4wLNX72/Uap6ues/ZHTC0ZDPOmGeeRqF1Yq2WVrYwXeZEa9HOsIT6nkQLFt vqK0WEqLWOhQzcscrueM1mgKjaZul1ZM4PuayzaEcYh5P7j8Z8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/14TWVA3jxTj9yO1HH1UIVUIog2E>
Subject: Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:00:09 -0000

On 2017-11-09 15:40, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> ...
> I've seen a copy of the to-be-published document, but I am not sure if
> it would be Ok to distribute it publicly.
> ...

FWIW: 
<https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm> 
is the new version.

Best regards, Julian