Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5004921F8818 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehFarN5Nah1e for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com (mail-ea0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A6621F86BA for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f13so3173086eaa.3 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N7aQNAWl6pZHpjZs7G0CgPdx4OJ70AA7UYe8nZVq3sk=; b=Xe5vy51L/m6u0SK4iVEtVNMznaGkV+vK0dl8M/550Y+fAHjylCWwBSEZMXkWIgMpjT OoFaHbD/O5qI5MZHa7KOmzxybfpzRJ6GUwypJJUCihsKygTVcRapUmNm5LB2wq/FoiLA h82uv/77qnzCNJQPdOfbWY8OcGmzS7SdIQ+W7s7v0NIoynA1ZKiMGfzdw1FMV/0nMxCD i+Dgt8rpQCivzwyqLhjBgEbA/S0HVlIozZkq1c6canJeAX9SkI/0+OaUpzfZzdxYHxvd XaePmH1DHxuo0jkAQDu92IP3jqlZtBZTNYVmZ7UuW/AG1/7+Tfvxh5lTySidH8gXrCWI Q1uA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.183.67 with SMTP id p43mr63474358eem.10.1361328462674; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.1.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:47:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <95501AA5-EA26-4D74-8C6B-187F0E52C524@mnot.net>
References: <E0597F3D-773C-4CDD-8087-09B99ADCF156@mnot.net> <CALcybBD-ksPe71YY9BY-NZ9VP0tNqToySn8zp+9swtM=P9MiCw@mail.gmail.com> <95501AA5-EA26-4D74-8C6B-187F0E52C524@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:47:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CALcybBA__74RTGwr6f0KV4=pw5jnRLGRs6Y9YtuYi=YBpyAYJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:47:44 -0000

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> There are ways to be aware of how JSON will be used without taking responsibility for defining those uses.
>

And that is what I said exactly. Your initial wording let the
impression that this working group SHOULD NOT care about the existing,
concrete uses of JSON.

And this is where I disagree. They SHOULD care. Not steer, but care.

-- 
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com